-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
KAFKA-19174 Gradle version upgrade 8 -->> 9 #19513
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
A label of 'needs-attention' was automatically added to this PR in order to raise the |
|
This PR is being marked as stale since it has not had any activity in 90 days. If you If you are having difficulty finding a reviewer, please reach out on the [mailing list](https://kafka.apache.org/contact). If this PR is no longer valid or desired, please feel free to close it. If no activity occurs in the next 30 days, it will be automatically closed. |
|
A label of 'needs-attention' was automatically added to this PR in order to raise the |
|
Update: project compilation works as expected (when powered by Gradle 9) but binary release creation fails. |
|
A label of 'needs-attention' was automatically added to this PR in order to raise the |
|
@dejan2609 any update? |
|
A label of 'needs-attention' was automatically added to this PR in order to raise the |
|
@chia7712 |
|
@dejan2609 thanks! |
|
Pending: I will also explain second problem (specific to Gradle 9, that is). |
|
A label of 'needs-attention' was automatically added to this PR in order to raise the |
| "-Dorg.gradle.appname=$APP_BASE_NAME" \ | ||
| -classpath "$CLASSPATH" \ | ||
| org.gradle.wrapper.GradleWrapperMain \ | ||
| -jar "$APP_HOME/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar" \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change, introduced in gradle 8.14, seems to be a behavioral change. It causes a no main manifest attribute error if developers use the old wrapper. I will file a PR to revert to the previous behavior and open a Jira ticket for 5.0 to remove the workaround
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I file the PR #20658 already.
…ome issues with Gradle 9+ are solved) (#20652) Extends from: #19513 Note: in Gradle 9+ we have to add a switch like this: ``` ./gradlew dependencyUpdates --no-parallel ``` Related link: https://github.com/ben-manes/gradle-versions-plugin/releases/tag/v0.53.0 Reviewers: Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>
|
@dejan2609 Thanks for working in this. It looks like a few custom tasks ( cc @chia7712 |
Ok, let me check that. |
|
@omkreddy Can't find issues here: |
|
@omkreddy The same goes for a current trunk state (no errors whatsoever): |
All in all: I see no errors here @omkreddy |
|
@dejan2609 I think the command/task (unitTest) is not running the tests. Normally we should see test execution output like On trunk: |
@omkreddy Are you referring to the command(s) that I used, i.e. See here for more details: https://docs.gradle.org/9.1.0/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_logging Now, even your output posted above shows no errors:
📢 Edit/update (after few days or so): I was wrong, @omkreddy was right: I was searching for errors and while it's true that there are none of them tests are still skipped |
|
@omkreddy Thanks for your report. We will take a look and test other commands to ensure everything works correctly |
Can we add a CI task that validates these commands? I'd assume that the goal should be to avoid regressions for these moving forward A separate workflow would be fine, I think |
|
I will file a PR to fix the task
there are many custom tasks in kafka, but yes it is worth having the CI - I have opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19780 to discuss that later. |
|
Another task, |
The simple fix is to add |
|
I noticed another error that was introduced by #12280 and it unrelated to Gradle9 It can be fixed by changing the |
…ded with a `--no-parallel` switch (#20683) Prologue: #19513 (comment) Also related to: #20652 @chia7712 I double-checked custom gradle commands in `README.md` and AFAIK we should be fine now. Reviewers: Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>
…-->> 9 (#20684) from: #19513 (comment) 1. Fix the task `unitTest` and `integrationTest`; 2. Change the `name` to a method call `name()` for `KeepAliveMode`. Reviewers: Ken Huang <[email protected]>, dejan2609 <[email protected]>, Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>
Extends from: #19513 details: - scala-logging_2.13: Updated from 3.9.5 to 3.9.6 - org.owasp.dependencycheck: Updated from 12.1.3 to 12.1.8 - org.scoverage: Updated from 8.0.3 to 8.1 - com.diffplug.spotless: Updated from 7.2.1 to 8.0.0 - scalafmt: Updated from 3.7.14 to 3.10.0 - grgit: Updated from 4.1.1 to 5.3.3 - jacoco: Updated from 0.8.13 to 0.8.14 - scoverage: Updated from 2.0.11 to 2.3.0 Reviewers: Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>
According to the [discussion](#19513 (comment)) in #19513 , add a new checksum verification process to determine whether a new wrapper JAR needs to be downloaded. This prevents developers from running into incompatibility issues when using an outdated wrapper JAR after a Gradle upgrade. Reviewers: Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>
According to the [discussion](apache#19513 (comment)) in apache#19513 , add a new checksum verification process to determine whether a new wrapper JAR needs to be downloaded. This prevents developers from running into incompatibility issues when using an outdated wrapper JAR after a Gradle upgrade. Reviewers: Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>
Related discussion:#20561 (comment) This PR primarily upgrades release tooling to JDK 25, and includes two fixes identified while dry-running `release.py` locally. 1. JDK upgrade: Switches `release.py` to run under JDK 25. 2. Pre‑req check false negative in git clean‑state verification task * When running `release.py` with a clean working tree, the script incorrectly failed the pre‑requisite check. ```bash $ git status On branch MINOR-1014 nothing to commit, working tree clean $ python release.py ... FAILURE: Pre-requisite not met: Verifying that you have no unstaged git changes. ``` * Root cause: the checks used `has_unstaged_changes()` / `has_staged_changes()` in a way that treated success as “has changes”. The fix inverts the logic to assert **no** changes. 3. Gradle 9 aggregatedJavadoc failure * With **Gradle 9**, `aggregatedJavadoc` currently fails in parallel mode. ``` FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * What went wrong: Execution failed for task ':aggregatedJavadoc'. > Resolution of the configuration ':connect:compileClasspath' was attempted without an exclusive lock. This is unsafe and not allowed. ``` * The change adds `--no-parallel` for the aggregated Javadoc step to avoid build failures (discussion: #19513 (comment)) Reviewers: Mickael Maison <[email protected]>, Ming-Yen Chung <[email protected]>, kuoche1712003 <[email protected]>, Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>

Related JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19174
List of changes:
9.0.09.1.09.0.28.3.9changes
Related links:
Notes:
Reviewers: Chia-Ping Tsai [email protected]